<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<oembed>
  <version>1</version>
  <type>rich</type>
  <provider_name>Libsyn</provider_name>
  <provider_url>https://www.libsyn.com</provider_url>
  <height>90</height>
  <width>600</width>
  <title>Notre Dame: Lessons for Philanthropy</title>
  <description>In episode 49, we explore some of the issues brought to light by the recent devastating fire at Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris and the immediate philanthropic response. Including: &amp;amp;nbsp; -Does the Notre Dame response demonstrate there is untapped philanthropic potential out there? -Why will people respond so readily to a damaged building, but ongoing efforts to address issues of human poverty and suffering remain hard to fundraise for? -Does this story illustrate that philanthropy is inherently irrational? If so, what should our conclusion be? -What is it about the Notre Dame disaster that has brought about such an unprecedented response? -Should we be grateful to the mega-donors who have pledged millions to Notre Dame, or ask what they are getting in return in terms of social status and legitimacy? -Do we need to scrutinise the source of wealth of these mega-donors, and whether they have paid their fair share of tax, and balance this against their desire to do good through giving? -If we agree that rebuilding Notre Dame constitutes a public good, should the French government pay for it through taxation and public spending? -Is it right for mega-donors to get tax breaks on their gifts to Notre Dame? Should they even get bigger tax breaks, as some have suggested? -What lessons can we take from this story for the wider debates about philanthropy? &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; Related Content -My mammoth Twitter thread on Notre Dame (and a nice one-page version) -The  &amp;quot;Criticisms of Philanthropy&amp;quot; chapter from my book Public Good by Private Means -Another extract from my book, about  Arts &amp;amp;amp; Culture philanthropy -&amp;quot;Everything Old is New Again&amp;quot;, Alliance Magazine -TAXING QUESTIONS: WHAT DO RUTGER BREGMAN'S DAVOS CRITICISMS MEAN FOR PHILANTHROPY?, CAF Giving Thought Blog -Meet The Philanthropists: A good pint - the brewing industry’s race to give -Previous Giving Thought podcast on &amp;quot;Is Philanthropy Rational?&amp;quot; -Neil Evans 1982 paper &amp;quot;Urbanisation, Elite Attitudes &amp;amp;amp; Philanthropy in Cardiff 1850-1914&amp;quot; </description>
  <author_name>Giving Thought</author_name>
  <author_url>https://www.cafonline.org/about-us/</author_url>
  <html>&lt;iframe title="Libsyn Player" style="border: none" src="//html5-player.libsyn.com/embed/episode/id/9687125/height/90/theme/custom/thumbnail/yes/direction/forward/render-playlist/no/custom-color/88AA3C/" height="90" width="600" scrolling="no"  allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html>
  <thumbnail_url>https://assets.libsyn.com/secure/content/41840252</thumbnail_url>
</oembed>
