{"version":1,"type":"rich","provider_name":"Libsyn","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.libsyn.com","height":90,"width":600,"title":"CD200: How to End Legal Bribes","description":"The currently legal ability of obscenely rich people to bribe lawmakers and law enforcers is the source of many - if not all - of our political problems. In this episode, get an update on the few democracy-enhancing bills that have moved in this Congress and Jen speaks to Sam Fieldman - the National Counsel at Wolf-PAC - who explains how we can constitutionally end the role of money in politics by going around Congress. Joe Briney joins Jen for the thank you's. Executive Producer: Randall Dibble  Please Support Congressional Dish \u2013 Quick Links   Click here to contribute monthly or a lump sum via  PayPal Click here to support Congressional Dish for each episode via Patreon Send Zelle payments to: Donation@congressionaldish.com Send Venmo payments to: @Jennifer-Briney Send Cash App payments to: $CongressionalDish or Donation@congressionaldish.com Use your bank's online bill pay function to mail contributions to:  5753 Hwy 85 North, Number 4576, Crestview, FL 32536  Please make checks payable to Congressional Dish Thank you for supporting truly independent media!  ______________________________________________________ Recommended Congressional Dish Episodes   CD129:The impeachment of John Koskinen    CD192: H.R. 1 Outline   Recommended Reading  Article:  Ensuring elections 'free from foreign intrusion' by John Sarbanes and Brian Frosh, Baltimore Sun, July 3, 2019   Article:  Alexander-Murrary Bill, by Donald Shaw, ReadSludge.com, June 10, 2019.   Article:  Microsoft and Election Guard&amp;nbsp;by Whitney Webb, MPN News, May 24, 2019.   Document: Ballot-Marking Devices (BMDs) Cannot Assure the Will of the Voters&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; SSRN, May 21, 2019   Article:  DHS to Assess Risks Posed to Ballot-Marking Devices by Mark Niese, GovTech, May 2, 2019.   Article:  DHS, FBI say election systems in all 50 states were targeted in 2016 by Sean Gallagher, ARS Technica, April 10, 2019.   Article:  Amid Election Integrity Criticism, Georgia Governor Signs Bill to Replace Voting Machines by Greg Bluestein and Mark Niesse, Governing, April 5, 2019.&amp;nbsp;   Article:  Firm\u2019s close ties to Georgia stir concerns about voting system purchase&amp;nbsp;by Mark Niesse, Atlanta Journal, January 30, 2019   Article:  \u201cOur best friend in this debate is the public,\u201d House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) told reporters on Friday. by Ella Nilsen, Vox, January 04, 2019.   Article:  How the GOP is using the Help America Vote Act to block voting, by Thom Hartmann, Salon.com, November 23, 2018.   Article:  The Latest: Some Georgia Statewide Races Too Close to Call&amp;nbsp; U.S. News, November 7, 2018.   Article:  VOTING MACHINES ARE STILL ABSURDLY VULNERABLE TO ATTACKS&amp;nbsp;by Lily Hay Newman, Wired, September 28, 2018.   Article:  Top Voting Machine Vendor Admits It Installed Remote-Access Software on Systems Sold to States&amp;nbsp;by Kim Zetter, Vice News, July 17, 2018.   Article:  Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Ran\u2014and Won\u2014as a Movement Candidate, by DD Guttenplan, The Nation, June 27, 2018.   Article: Voting machine vendor treated election officials to trips to Vegas, elsewhere&amp;nbsp; by Greg Gordon, Amy Renee Leiker, Jamie Self and Stanley Dunlap, McClatchy DC Bureau, June 21, 2018.   Document:  LD-2 Lobbying Report Disclosure Form&amp;nbsp;Secretary of the Senate Office of Public Records, 2018   Data:  Lobbying Spending Data:Lobbyists representing Election Systems &amp;amp; Software, 2018&amp;nbsp; OpenSecrets.org, 2018.   Article:  The Fraud Behind Article V Convention Opposition&amp;nbsp; by Sam Fieldman, Medium.com, October 12, 2017.   Article:  Some Machines Are Flipping Votes, But That Doesn't Mean They're Rigged&amp;nbsp; by Pam Fessler, NPR, October 26, 2016.   Document: 2012 REDMAP Summary Report&amp;nbsp; Redistricting Majority Project, January 4, 2013.   Document:  Report on Proper Use of Campaign Funds and Resources&amp;nbsp; Committee on Ethics, January 4, 2013.   Document: Title 36 organizations&amp;nbsp; Every CRSRReport.com, June 17, 2011.  &amp;nbsp;_____________________________________________________ Bill Outline  H.R. 2722: SAFE Act Sponsor: Zoe Lofgren of northern California 74 pages Passed the House on June 27, 2019  225-184  Only GOP yes: Newbie Rep. Brian Mast - 38 year old wounded Afghanistan war veteran representing the Palm Beach area  Went to the Committee on Rules and Administration in the Senate  Title 1: Financial Support for Election Infrastructure Subtitle A: Voting System Security Improvement Grants  Sec. 102: Paper ballot requirements  \u201cThe voting system shall require the use of an individual, durable, voter-verified paper ballot of the voters\u2019 vote that shall be marked and made available for inspection and verification by the voter before the voter\u2019s vote is cast and counted, which shall be counted by hand or read by an optical character recognition device or other counting device.&quot; \u201cThe voting system shall provide the voter with an opportunity to correct any error on the paper ballot\u2026\u201d Recounts: The paper ballot \u201cshall constitute the official ballot and shall be preserved and used as the official ballot for purposes any recount or audit conducted with respect to any election for Federal office in which the voting system is used.\u201d   Sec. 104: Durability and readability requirements for ballots  Ballots must be on \u201cdurable\u201d paper, which means it is capable of withstanding multiple recounts by hand without compromising the fundamental integrity of the ballots\u201d and they must maintain readability for 22 months.   Sec. 105: Recycled Paper  Ballots must be printed on recycled paper starting on January 1, 2021.   Sec. 107: These rules will apply \u201cfor any election for Federal office held in 2020 or any succeeding year.\u201d  Grandfathered equipment: Districts using machines that print paper ballots with the votes already tallied can use those machines until 2022, but they must offer every voter the opportunity to vote using a blank paper ballot, which are not allowed to be designated as provisional.   Sec. 111:Grants for equipment changes  Federal tax money will be given to states to replace their voting system, if needed. Grant amount: At least $1 per the average number of people who voted in the last two elections To use these grants, the states can only buy voting equipment from a vendor \u201cowned and controlled by a citizen or permanent resident of the United States\u201d The vendor must tell government officials if they get any part of their election infrastructure parts from outside the United States Authorizes (but doesn\u2019t appropriate) $600 million for 2019 and $175 million for each even number election year through 2026   Subtitle B:Risk-Limiting Audits  Sec. 121: Risk-limited audits required for all elections for Federal office  State election officials will make the rules for how these will be done   Sec. 122: Federal government will pay for audits  Authorizes \u201csuch sums as are necessary\u201d   Title II: Promoting Cybersecurity Through Improvements in Election Administration  Sec. 201: Voting system cybersecurity requirements   Vote counting machine rules  Machines that count ballots must be built so that &quot;it\u2019s mechanically impossible for the device to add or change the vote selections on a printed or market ballot\u201d The device must be \u201ccapable of exporting its data (including vote tally data sets and cast vote records) in a machine-readable, open data standards format\u201d The device\u2019s software\u2019s source code, system build tools, and compilation parameters must be given to certain Federal and State regulators and \u201cmay be shared by any entity to whom it has been provided\u2026 with independent experts for cybersecurity analysis.\u201d The devise must have technology that allows \u201celection officials, cybersecurity researchers, and voters to verify that the software running on the device was built from a specific, untampered version of the code\u201d that was provided to Federal and State regulators. Loophole for moles: The Director of Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security can waive any of the requirements other than the first one that prohibits machines that can change votes. The waivers can be applied to a device for no more than two years. The waivers must be publicly available on the Internet. Not effective until November 2024 election.    Ballot marking machines and vote counters can\u2019t use or \u201cbe accessible by any wireless, power-line, or concealed communication device\u201d or \u201cconnected to the Internet or any non-local computer system via telephone or other communication network at any time.\u201d  Effective for the 2020 general election and all elections after    Ballot marking devices can\u2019t be capable of counting votes  States may submit applications to Federal regulators for testing and certification the accuracy of ballot marking machines, but they don\u2019t have to.     Sec. 202: Testing of existing voting systems  9 months before each regularly scheduled general election for Federal offices, \u201caccredited laboratories\u201d will test the voting system hardware and software with was certified for use in the most recent election. If the hardware and software fails the test, it \u201cshall\u201d be decertified. Effective for the 2020 General Election.   Sec. 203: Requiring use of software and hardware for which information is disclosed by manufacturer  \u201cIn the operation of voting systems in an election for Federal office, a State may only use software for which the manufacturer makes the source code\u2026 publicly available online under a license that grants a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive, perpetual, sub-licensable license to all intellectual property rights in such source code\u2026.&quot;  \u2026except that the manufacturer may prohibit people from using the software for commercial advantage or \u201cprivate monetary compensation\u201d that is unrelated to doing legitimate research.   States \u201cmay not use a voting system in an election for Federal office unless the manufacture of the system publicly discloses online the identification of the hardware used to operate the system\u201d  If the voting system is not widely-used, the manufacture must make the design \u201cpublicly available online under a license that grants a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive, perpetual, sub-licensable license to all intellectual property rights\u2026\u201d   Effective for the 2020 General election   Sec. 204: Poll books will be counted as part of voting systems for these regulations  Effective January 1, 2020   Title III: Use of voting machines manufactured in the United States  Sec. 301: Voting machines must be manufactured in the United States   HR 391: White House Ethics Transparency Act of 2019 Pdf of the bill Reported June 12, 2019 out of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform 23-16 On January 28, 2017 - a week after taking office - President Trump issued  an executive order that requires all executive agency appointees to sign and be contractually obligated to a pledge that\u2026  The appointee won\u2019t lobby his\/her former agency for 5 years after leaving Will not lobby the administration he\/she previously worked for Will not, after leaving government, \u201cengage in any activity on behalf of any foreign government or foreign political party which, were it undertaken on January 20, 2017, would require me to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938\u201d Will not accept gifts from registered lobbyists Will recuse themselves from any matter involving their former employers for two years from the date of their appointment If the appointee was a lobbyist before entering government, that person will not work on any matter that they had lobbied for for 2 years after the appointment  BUT Section 3 allows waivers: \u201cThe President or his designee may grant to any person a waiver of any restrictions contained in the pledge signed by such person.\u201d  Sec. 2: Requires any executive branch official who gets a waiver to submit a written copy to the Director of the Office of Government Ethics and make a written copy of the waiver available to the public on the website of the agency where the appointee works.  Backdated to January 20, 2017 (President Trump\u2019s inauguration)   H.R. 745: Executive Branch Comprehensive Ethics Enforcement Act of 2019 Reported March 26, 2019 out of the Committee on Oversight and Reform 18-12 Pdf of the bill&amp;nbsp;  Sec. 2: Creates a transition ethics program  Requires the President-elect to give Congress a list of everyone in consideration for security clearance within 10 days of the applications submission and a list of everyone granted security clearance within 10 days of their approval. Requires the transition team to create and enforce an \u201cethics plan\u201d that needs to describe the role of registered lobbyists on the transition team, the role of people registered as foreign agents, and which transition team members of sources of income which are not known by the public Transition team members must be prohibited by the ethics plan from working on matters where they have \u201cpersonal financial conflicts of interest\u201d during the transition and explain how they plan to address those conflicts of interest during the incoming administration. The transition team ethics plan must be publicly avail on the website of the General Services Administration Transition team members need to submit a list of all positions they have held outside the Federal Government for the previous 12 months -including paid and unpaid positions-, all sources of compensation that exceed $5,000 in the previous 12 months, and a list of policy issues worked on in their previous roles, a list of issues the team member will be recused from as part of the administration. Transition team members that do not comply will not be granted any access to the Federal department or agency that isn\u2019t open to the public.    S. 195 : Creates a transition ethics program: Access to Congressionally Mandated Reports Act Pdf of the bill &amp;nbsp; Reported 4\/10\/19 out of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. On Senate Calendar  Sec. 2: Definitions  \u201cCongressionally mandated report\u201d means a report that is required to be submitted to Congress by a bill, resolution, or conference report that becomes law.  Does NOT include reports required from 92 nonprofit corporations labeled as \u201cPatriotic and National Organizations\u201d (\u201cTitle 36 corporations\u201d)     Sec. 3: Website for reports  1 year after enactment, there needs to be a website \u201cthat allows the public to obtain electronic copies of all congressionally mandated reports in one place\u201d If a Federal agency fails to submit a report, the website will tell us the information that is required by law and the date when the report was supposed to be submitted The government can\u2019t charge a fee for access to the reports The reports can be redacted by the Federal agencies   Resources  Twitter Link: Rachel Maddow Twitter Link&amp;nbsp; Twitter.   Employment Profile: Employment History for Richardson, Sean J OpenSecrets.org   Employment Profile:  Employment History for Jen Olson&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;OpenSecrets.org   Email Link: Sam Fieldman Email at Wolf-PAC&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;   PDF Email:  Email with Eli Baumwell of the W.V. ACLU   Volunteer Link: Volunteer for Wolf-PAC   Resource Link: Article V Wolf-PAC Resource Link   Documentary:  Wolf Pac Documentary   Congressional Dish Interview:  Interview with Sam Fieldman from Wolf-PAC   Preet Bharara Podcast:  Taking Trump to Court (with David Cole)   YouTube Video:  Wolf PAC Call for Volunteers - Get Money Out of Politics!   YouTube Video: Mike Monetta On Why Wolf-PAC Is Making A Movie   YouTube Video: Wolf PAC Resolution Passes New Jersey Senate&amp;nbsp;   YouTube Video: Fight Against Money In Politics: Cenk Uygur (Wolf-PAC Presentation)   YouTube Video: Republican Vermont Representative Vicky Strong   YouTube Video: Americans for Prosperity testify in New Jersey   YouTube Video: Hawaii Senate Judiciary Hearing on 2018 SCR 76, Wolf-PAC   YouTube Video: Cenk Uygur's Speech at The Conference to Restore the Republic   YouTube Video:  Article V Debate   Document:  Case Docket: Citizens United v. Fed. Election Comm'n   Document:  Brief by ACLU in support of Citizens United   Document:  Brief by former members of the ACLU in support of neither party   Document:  Essay on Term Limits   Document:  Article V of the US Constitution - Overview   Document: Virginia Plan (First draft of the Constitution)   Document:  Full Text of Congressional Regulations on Article V   Document:  1984 Version of Congressional Regulations on Article V   Document:  1987 Version of Congressional Regulations on Article V&amp;nbsp;   Document:  Congressional Record Archive Copy of Congressional Regulations on Article V   Document: The Fix It America Constitutional Amendment   Document: Take Back our Republic   Document:  Role of Congress   Document:  American Promise 28th Amendment   Document: United for the People Amendments   Reference Website:  Massachusetts Commission   Govtrack: H.R. 2722   Document:  H.R. 391   Document: H.R. 745   Document: H.R. 745   Document: H.R. 964   Document: S. 195   &amp;nbsp; Sound Clip Sources  Watch on C-Span: House floor debate on HR 2722 June 27,2019  sound clip transcripts pdf   Watch on C-Span: William Barr Testifies on Mueller Report Before Senate Judiciary Committee May 1, 2019  1:57:55 Sen. Amy Klocuchar (MN): For the last two years, Senator Lankford and I, on a bipartisan bill with support from the ranking and the head of the intelligence committee; have been trying to get the Secure Elections Act passed. This would require backup paper ballots. If anyone gets federal funding for an election, it would require audits, um, and it would require better cooperation. Yet the White House, just as we were on the verge of getting a markup in the rules committee (getting it to the floor where I think we would get the vast majority of senators), the White House made calls to stop this. Were you aware of that? Attorney General William Barr: No. Sen. Amy Klocuchar (MN): Okay, well that happened. So what I would like to know from you as our nation\u2019s chief law enforcement officer if you will work with Senator Lankford and I to get this bill done? Because otherwise we are not going to have any clout to get backup paper ballots if something goes wrong in this election. Attorney General William Barr: Well, I will\u2026 I will work with you, uh, to, uh, enhance the security of our election and I\u2019ll take a look at what you\u2019re proposing. I\u2019m not familiar with it. Sen. Amy Klocuchar (MN): Okay. Well, it is the bipartisan bill. It has Senator Burr and Senator Warner. It\u2019s support from Senator Graham was on the bill. Senator Harris is on the bill and the leads are Senator Lankford and myself, and it had significant support in the house as well.   Hearing:  Committee on Oversight and Reform:Strengthening Ethics Rules for the Executive Branch, February 6, 2019 Watch on Youtube  *28:00 Rep Jordan (OH): 2013 we learned that the IRS targeted conservative for their political beliefs during the 2012 election cycle systematically for a sustained period of time. They went after people for their conservative beliefs, plan in place, targeted people. They did it. The gross abuse of power would have continued, if not for the efforts of this committee. 2014 the Obama Administration doubled down and attempted to use the IRS rule making process to gut the ability of social welfare organizations to participate in public debate. Congress has so far prevented this regulation from going into effect, but HR 1 would change that.   Hearing:  Judiciary Committee For The People Act Of 2019, January 29, 2019&amp;nbsp; Witness:   Sherrilyn Ifill - President and Director-Counsel, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund   Watch on YouTube  32:00 Sherrilyn Ifill: Well before the midterm election, in fact, Georgia officials began placing additional burdens on voters, particularly black and Latino voters, by closing precincts and purging. Over half a million people from the voter rolls the voter purge, which removed 107,000 people, simply because they did not vote in previous elections and respond to a mailing was overseen by the Republican candidate for governor Brian Kemp, who was also the secretary of state. LDF and a chorus of others called on him to recuse himself from participating in the election. But he refused.&amp;nbsp;  ______________________________________________________ Community Suggestions See Community Suggestions HERE.  Cover Art Design by Only Child Imaginations  ______________________________________________________ Music Presented in This Episode Intro &amp;amp; Exit:  Tired of Being Lied To by David Ippolito (found on Music Alley by mevio) ","author_name":"Congressional Dish","author_url":"https:\/\/congressionaldish.com","html":"<iframe title=\"Libsyn Player\" style=\"border: none\" src=\"\/\/html5-player.libsyn.com\/embed\/episode\/id\/10475954\/height\/90\/theme\/custom\/thumbnail\/yes\/direction\/forward\/render-playlist\/no\/custom-color\/393ba9\/\" height=\"90\" width=\"600\" scrolling=\"no\"  allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen><\/iframe>","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/assets.libsyn.com\/secure\/content\/47028245"}