{"version":1,"type":"rich","provider_name":"Libsyn","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.libsyn.com","height":90,"width":600,"title":"What the Supreme Court\u2019s Janus decision means for unions and workers","description":"In this episode of Intersections, Vanessa Williamson and Elizabeth Mann Levesque review the Supreme Court's ruling on Janus v. AFSCME, which bars public-sector unions from collecting &quot;fair share&quot; or &quot;agency&quot; fees from non-union members to offset collective bargaining costs.&amp;nbsp;Levesque and Williamson put the Janus case in the context of &quot;right-to-work&quot; legislation, the decline of private-sector unions, and the recent wave of teachers' strikes to assess how the decision will affect public-sector unions in the short term and future of unions' economic and political power more broadly.&amp;nbsp; Full show notes:&amp;nbsp;https:\/\/brook.gs\/2Jz61OQ&amp;nbsp; Hosted by Adrianna Pita. With thanks to audio producer Gaston Reboredo, Chris McKenna, Brennan Hoban, and Fred Dews for additional support. Send feedback email to&amp;nbsp;intersections@brookings.edu, and follow us and tweet us at&amp;nbsp;@policypodcasts&amp;nbsp;on Twitter. Intersections is part of the Brookings Podcast Network. ","author_name":"Please Discuss ...","author_url":"http:\/\/www.brookings.edu\/utility\/podcasts","html":"<iframe title=\"Libsyn Player\" style=\"border: none\" src=\"\/\/html5-player.libsyn.com\/embed\/episode\/id\/6826009\/height\/90\/theme\/custom\/thumbnail\/yes\/direction\/forward\/render-playlist\/no\/custom-color\/88AA3C\/\" height=\"90\" width=\"600\" scrolling=\"no\"  allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen><\/iframe>","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/assets.libsyn.com\/secure\/content\/206649178"}