{"version":1,"type":"rich","provider_name":"Libsyn","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.libsyn.com","height":90,"width":600,"title":"Isocrates' Encomium of Helen (new and improved!)","description":"Welcome to MR podcast for beginners and insiders about the people, terms and movements who have shaped rhetorical history. We\u2019re beholden to the humanities media project at the university of Texas for support for this re-recording that sounds so good. And This is a re-recording, so recognize that it might not fit into a normal timeline. This was supposed to come after the Encomium ofHelen written by Gorgias. It\u2019s a come back written by my favorite sophist--Isocrates.   Isocrates had a complaint that Gorgias has not written a true encomium, but an apologia--a defense. He only defended her actions as not her fault instead of saying what she was actually excellent at. Isocrates complains that the encomium of helen is flaky, like the encomiums of bees or salt that other sophist have written. And, like so many of us, he uses this technicality to fuel his own attempt. It kind of reminds me of the Phaedrus, where Socrates wants to correct the speech he has just heard from another sophist. Something about seeing something done wrong makes you want to do it right.   And Isocrates is certain that is has been done wrong. First lines of his encomium demonstrate that: \u201cThere are some who think it a great thing if they put forward an odd, paradoxical theme and can discuss it without giving offense\u201d Complaints against the sophist especially gorgias--Isocrates was one of those people who thought Gorgias was disreputable, moving around all the time, proving impossibles all the time, and, damningly, a political.  \u201cThe most ridiculous thing of all is that they seek to persuade us through their speeches that they have knowledge of politics\u201d (9).  Writing about trivial things means that people will listen, admire--but not debate. By taking novel topics instead of political, they are easily the best--like being the best player of Calvinball. Instead, Isocrates praises in a political vein, using Helen as a figure for a contemporary controversy. But he does so in a roundabout way.   So to praise Helen, starts by praising her absconder. He mentions himself that \u201cit would not yet be clear whether my speech is in praise of Helen or a prosecution of theseus\u201d (21) But he argues by association: those who are \u201cloved and admired her were themselves more admirable than the rest\u201d (22). So, that argument goes, those who wanted Helen were the best sort, so she was, by assoication, pretty great. There\u2019s a lot of praise of Theseus here for a supposed praise of Helen, but the Theseus Isocrates paints is a hero, not just of himself, like Hercules was, but for the Greek people in general he \u201cfreed the inhabitants of the city from great fear and distress\u201d (25) and \u201cthought it was better to die than to live and rule a site that was compelled to pay such a sorrowful tribute to its enemies\u201d (27). Theseus was a selfless, poltical heo who has \u201ccirtue and soundness of mind \u2026 especially in his managment of the city. He saw that those who seek to rule the citizens by force became slaves to others and those who put others\u2019 lives in danger live in fear themselves\u201d (32-33).   Indeed, there\u2019s so much civic love for Theseus here that you set the idea that Isocrates here isn\u2019t just talking about fiction, or myth, or history , but politics. This is not just a fun triffle , a parodoxologia like where Gorgias made Helen a hero instead of a villian. this is not paignion, a fun peice of exhition. George Kenedy argues that Isocrates goes on at such great length about theseus because \u201ctheseus is worthy of Helen\u201d and similarly \u201cAthens is worth of the hegemony which it should take from Sparta\u201d (81). In other words, The Helen is \u201cin fact a clear statement of Isorates\u2019 program of Panhellenism\u201d (80)--a united federation of greek city states helmed by Athens.   The praise of Helen herself backs up this idea: \u201cIt is due to Helen that we are not the slaves of the barbarian\u201d paraphrases Kennedy (82). Isocrates talks about Helen the way that 19th century americans talked about manifest destiny: \u201cA longing for beautiful things,... is innate in us, and it has a strength greater than our other wishes\u201d and \u201cwe enslave ourselves to such people with more pleasure than we rule others\u201d (55-57). Helen wasn\u2019t just beautiful--she was devine. She \u201cacheive more than other mortals just as she excelled over them in appearances. Not only did she win immortality, but she also gained power equal to the gods\u2019\u201d (61). While Theseus was honored by association to be chosen to judge the gods, Helen was defied, and --and this is important for the political analogy--she was able to assist in the apotheiosis of Menelaisis and others.   In the end, Isocrates\u2019 Helen is several things at once: it is a criticism of the Gorgias and the other traveling sophists, who made their living by proving the impossible in demonstration speeches that delighted and caused, to paraphrase Gorgias\u2019 own words, amusement for the authors. He\u2019s presenting a political tract, similar to the one in the PanAthenaicus, where he argues for a more involved Athenian hegemony in panhellenic unity. He\u2019s also presenting a pedagogical advertisment: study with me, he says, and you\u2019ll create real political speeches, not fluffy bits of taffy. At the end of the speech, ever the teacher, Isocrates says \u201cIf, then, some people wish to elaborate this material and expand on it, they will not lack material to stimulate their praise of Helen beyond what I have said, but they will find many original arguments to make about her\u201d--yes, he\u2019s setting up his potential students to use his encomium--a real encomium--as a model for their own, future, semi-scaffolded work.   If you have your own example of using your own writing to help your students learn about differnt genres, I\u2019d love to hear about it. Send me an email at mererhetoricpodcast@gmail.com or get in contact how ever you\u2019d like. I recently heard from Rik in Holland (which, incidentally is awesome) that he listens to the podcast on his commute to Groningen University and when he walks the dog, as well as using the podcast in his own classes. Rik! I love to listen to podcasts walking a dog, or commuting, so good on you! Rik also made a suggestion for a podcast on framing, and, by gum, that sounds great, so look forward to hearing about framing in the future, Rik and all the dog walkers and everyone no matter where they are or what they do while listening to Mere Rhetoric.     ","author_name":"Mere Rhetoric","author_url":"http:\/\/mererhetoric.libsyn.com","html":"