{"version":1,"type":"rich","provider_name":"Libsyn","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.libsyn.com","height":90,"width":600,"title":"8-5-26","description":" En Minnesota, activistas han estado derribando ilegalmente c\u00e1maras de Flock, las cuales usan IA para leer n\u00fameros de placa, pero que la polic\u00eda tambi\u00e9n utiliza para llevar a cabo vigilancia masiva sin orden judicial. En Winona, en un lapso de cuatro d\u00edas, ocho c\u00e1maras fueron cortadas de sus postes y robadas. Acciones similares tuvieron lugar en Duluth, Plymouth, Edina, el condado de Anoka y Faribault. S\u00f3lo se realiz\u00f3 una detenci\u00f3n. Las acciones forman parte de un creciente movimiento nacional. Los activistas comparten informaci\u00f3n y t\u00e1cticas por internet, incluidas grabaciones de sus propias acciones, ocultando tanto su identidad f\u00edsica como su identidad en linea. Las c\u00e1maras de Flock generan controversia no solo por las preocupaciones sobre la privacidad b\u00e1sica, sino tambi\u00e9n porque las agencias policiales las han utilizado ilegalmente para acosar a personas y compartir informaci\u00f3n con el ICE. Un informe publicado por The Guardian identific\u00f3 al menos treinta y tres casos de da\u00f1os a c\u00e1maras de Flock en veintitr\u00e9s estados. M\u00e1s de ochenta gobiernos municipales han rechazado los contratos con Flock, empresa que opera en unas seis mil comunidades de todo el pa\u00eds. La polic\u00eda defienden las c\u00e1maras como herramientas esenciales para resolver delitos, y da\u00f1arlas se considera un delito grave. In Minnesota, activists have been illegally removing Flock cameras, the AI-equipped license plate readers that are also used by police to do mass surveillance without a warrant. In Winona, eight cameras within four days were sawed off their poles and taken. Similar actions happened in Duluth, Plymouth, Edina, Anoka County, and Faribault. Only one arrest was made. The actions are part of a growing national movement. Activists share information and tactics online, including footage of their own actions, all while hiding both their physical and internet identities. Flock cameras are controversial due to not only concerns of basic privacy, but also because police agencies have been using them illegally to stalk people and share information with ICE. A report published by The Guardian identified at least thirty three instances of people damaging Flock cameras across twenty three states. Over eighty city governments have rejected Flock contracts, and the company operates in about six thousand communities nationwide. Police defend the cameras as essential crime-solving tools, and damaging them is considered a felony. ","author_name":"Bolet\u00edn de Noticias de KBBF \/ KBBF News Bulletin","author_url":"https:\/\/sites.libsyn.com\/460356","html":"