{"version":1,"type":"rich","provider_name":"Libsyn","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.libsyn.com","height":90,"width":600,"title":"The Valley Current\u00ae: Does Civility Enforcement via Sanctions Cause More Incivility?","description":"What if the legal system's effort to enforce civility is actually fueling more incivility? In today's episode of The Valley Current\u00ae, host Jack Russo examines the "punisher's paradox" and asks whether sanctions deter misconduct or simply become another weapon in high-stakes litigation. Using the recent Patel v. GT's Living Foods case as a lens, Jack explores how today's procedural battles often overshadow the underlying dispute, trapping lawyers in costly cycles of retaliation while clients foot the bill. Drawing on game theory, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1, and decades of sanctions history, the conversation challenges whether punishment alone can restore professionalism in the courtroom. If sanctions create more conflict than cooperation, is it time to rethink how justice is managed from the bench? Jack Russo Managing Partner Jrusso@computerlaw.com www.computerlaw.com https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/jackrusso "Every Entrepreneur Imagines a Better World"\u00ae\ufe0f   ","author_name":"THE VALLEY CURRENT\u00ae\ufe0f COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLP","author_url":"http:\/\/computerlaw.libsyn.com\/website","html":"