{"version":1,"type":"rich","provider_name":"Libsyn","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.libsyn.com","height":90,"width":600,"title":"6-26-26 IMMIGRATION","description":"  El jueves, la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos restringi\u00f3 la posibilidad de que los migrantes soliciten asilo en la frontera entre Estados Unidos y M\u00e9xico al ratificar la pol\u00edtica de \u201cdosificaci\u00f3n\u201d del gobierno de Trump. El fallo, que se decidi\u00f3 con una votaci\u00f3n de seis a tres, se basa en la definici\u00f3n de la palabra &quot;llega&quot; en la Ley de Inmigraci\u00f3n y Nacionalidad. Dicha ley permite que una persona que se encuentre f\u00edsicamente presente en Estados Unidos o que llegue al pa\u00eds solicite asilo. La opini\u00f3n de la Corte, redactada por el juez Samuel Alito, dictamin\u00f3 que los migrantes detenidos en el lado mexicano de la frontera no han llegado legalmente a Estados Unidos, afirmando que &quot;en el lenguaje com\u00fan, nadie dir\u00eda que una persona 'llega' a un lugar... antes de entrar en \u00e9l&quot;. Esto revoca el fallo de un tribunal inferior que sosten\u00eda que los migrantes hab\u00edan &quot;llegado&quot; al alcanzar un puerto de entrada, independientemente de si hab\u00edan pisado f\u00edsicamente suelo estadounidense. Esta decisi\u00f3n reactiva de hecho la pol\u00edtica de \u201cdosificaci\u00f3n\u201d, mediante la cual los funcionarios de inmigraci\u00f3n estadounidenses pueden limitar el n\u00famero de solicitantes de asilo que se procesan cada d\u00eda en los pasos fronterizos, alegando hacinamiento o escasez de recursos.   On Thursday, the US Supreme Court restricted the ability of migrants to seek asylum at the U.S.-Mexico border by upholding the Trump administration\u2019s \u201cmetering\u201d policy. The ruling, decided by a six-to-three vote, revolves around the definition of the word &quot;arrives&quot; in the Immigration and Nationality Act. The law allows a person who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States to apply for asylum. The Court\u2019s opinion, authored by Justice Samuel Alito, ruled that migrants stopped on the Mexican side of the border have not legally arrived in the United States, stating, &quot;in ordinary speech, no one would say that a person 'arrives in' a place (\u2026) before the person enters that place.\u201d This overturns a lower court's ruling that migrants had &quot;arrived&quot; when they reached a port of entry, regardless of whether they had physically stepped onto U.S. soil. This ruling effectively revives the &quot;metering&quot; policy, where U.S. immigration officials can limit the number of asylum seekers processed each day at border crossings by citing overcrowding or resource constraints. ","author_name":"Bolet\u00edn de Noticias de KBBF \/ KBBF News Bulletin","author_url":"https:\/\/sites.libsyn.com\/460356","html":"<iframe title=\"Libsyn Player\" style=\"border: none\" src=\"\/\/html5-player.libsyn.com\/embed\/episode\/id\/41835015\/height\/90\/theme\/custom\/thumbnail\/yes\/direction\/forward\/render-playlist\/no\/custom-color\/88AA3C\/\" height=\"90\" width=\"600\" scrolling=\"no\"  allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen><\/iframe>","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/assets.libsyn.com\/secure\/item\/41835015"}