{"version":1,"type":"rich","provider_name":"Libsyn","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.libsyn.com","height":90,"width":600,"title":"When It Comes to Juries, All of a Sudden the Supreme Court Can See Race","description":"OA1270 - A good court thingie! A famous case from 1986 gave us the \u201cBatson rule\u201d that prevents the use of \u201cperemptory strikes\u201d to remove people from juries on the basis of race. To this day, racial discrimination in jury selection continues to be a problem. But the Supreme Court recently reinforced the on-going utility of Batson challenges in two decisions\u2026 written by Kavanaugh? Tune in to learn about the history and modern application of this important protection of our rights.   Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202 (1965)   Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986)   J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B., 511 U.S. 127 (1994)   Flowers v. Mississippi, 588 U.S. 284 (2019)   Pitchford v. Cain, 608 U.S. ___ (2026)   Batson \u201cJustifications\u201d   Catherine M. Grosso &amp;amp; Barbara O\u2019Brien, A Stubborn Legacy: The Overwhelming Importance of Race in Jury Selection in 173 Post-Batson North Carolina Capital Trials, 97 Iowa L. Rev. 1531 (2012).   Shamena Anwar, Patrick Bayer, &amp;amp; Randi Hjalmarsson, The Impact of Jury Race in Criminal Trials, 127 Q.J. Econ. 1017 (2011).   Check out the OA Linktree for all the places to go and things to do! ","author_name":"Opening Arguments","author_url":"http:\/\/openargs.com","html":"<iframe title=\"Libsyn Player\" style=\"border: none\" src=\"\/\/html5-player.libsyn.com\/embed\/episode\/id\/41622250\/height\/90\/theme\/custom\/thumbnail\/yes\/direction\/forward\/render-playlist\/no\/custom-color\/88AA3C\/\" height=\"90\" width=\"600\" scrolling=\"no\"  allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen><\/iframe>","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/assets.libsyn.com\/secure\/item\/41622250"}