{"version":1,"type":"rich","provider_name":"Libsyn","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.libsyn.com","height":90,"width":600,"title":"The Valley Current\u00ae: Musk v. Altman: Round 4 TKO","description":"       Day four brings sharp exchanges, headline admissions, and a courtroom locked in, but the real shift is happening beneath the surface. Elon Musk\u2019s testimony, including admitting he didn\u2019t read key deal terms and acknowledging limited AI distillation, cuts directly against the foundation of his case. Step back, and the focus turns to timing. Evidence points to Musk having suspicions as early as 2017, putting the statute of limitations front and center. With the judge signaling the case could be decided on that issue alone, the trial begins to feel less like a fight and more like a process playing out. This may look like a courtroom battle, but the outcome was likely sealed years ago.         Jack Russo Managing Partner Jrusso@computerlaw.com www.computerlaw.com https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/jackrusso &quot;Every Entrepreneur Imagines a Better World&quot;\u00ae\ufe0f &amp;nbsp; ","author_name":"THE VALLEY CURRENT\u00ae\ufe0f COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLP","author_url":"http:\/\/computerlaw.libsyn.com\/website","html":"<iframe title=\"Libsyn Player\" style=\"border: none\" src=\"\/\/html5-player.libsyn.com\/embed\/episode\/id\/41166205\/height\/90\/theme\/custom\/thumbnail\/yes\/direction\/forward\/render-playlist\/no\/custom-color\/88AA3C\/\" height=\"90\" width=\"600\" scrolling=\"no\"  allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen><\/iframe>","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/assets.libsyn.com\/secure\/content\/202079325"}