{"version":1,"type":"rich","provider_name":"Libsyn","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.libsyn.com","height":90,"width":600,"title":"Chullin 2 - Shabbat May 2, 15 Iyar","description":" Study Guide The Mishna rules that all are permitted to slaughter animals, and if they do, the meat is kosher. While establishing this broad permission, the Mishna excludes minors, deaf-mutes (cheresh), and the mentally incompetent (shoteh). However, if an adult supervises them to ensure the slaughter was performed correctly, the meat is valid. The Gemara questions the Mishna\u2019s phrasing: the opening phrase \u201call may slaughter\u201d implies an ab initio (l\u2019chatchila) permission, yet the concluding phrase \u201ctheir slaughtering is kosher\u201d suggests the act is only valid post facto (b\u2019dieved). Initially, Rav Acha attempts to prove from other Mishnayot that the term \u201call\u201d can indeed refer to a post facto case, neutralizing the question. Conversely, Rav Ashi cites other Mishnayot to show that \u201call\u201d is a term typically used for ab initio rulings. While both ultimately concede that \u201call\u201d can technically carry both meanings, Rav Ashi argues that the context here implies ab initio. To resolve the Gemara\u2019s original difficulty, Rava bar Ulla explains that each phrase in the Mishna refers to a different specific case, and he proceeds to re-interpret each line accordingly. However, three difficulties are subsequently raised against Rava bar Ulla\u2019s interpretation, all of which the Gemara eventually resolves. ","author_name":"Daf Yomi for Women - Hadran","author_url":"https:\/\/hadran.org.il\/","html":"