{"version":1,"type":"rich","provider_name":"Libsyn","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.libsyn.com","height":90,"width":600,"title":"An Under-the-Radar Copyright Case with Huge Implications","description":"OA1254 - An underreported on case called Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment could be a much bigger deal than it seems. Record labels say Cox let repeat infringers run wild on its network and a jury hit them with a massive verdict. Cox says it\u2019s not the internet police and shouldn\u2019t be on the hook for what users do. So how far does that responsibility go? When does \u201cyou could have stopped this\u201d turn into legal liability? We break down the DMCA\u2019s \u201crepeat infringer\u201d rules and why this case isn\u2019t just about piracy. The real question is whether companies can be forced to cut people off or redesign their services to prevent misuse and where that logic stops. If failing to stop wrongdoing makes you liable here, what does that mean for platforms, payment processors, or even industries like gun sales where the argument is also \u201cyou should have done more\u201d? Check out the OA Linktree for all the places to go and things to do! ","author_name":"Opening Arguments","author_url":"http:\/\/openargs.com","html":"