{"version":1,"type":"rich","provider_name":"Libsyn","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.libsyn.com","height":90,"width":600,"title":"[Legal Fictions] The Life and Work of Professor Paul-Andr\u00e9 Cr\u00e9peau","description":"The late Professor Paul Andr\u00e9 Cr\u00e9peau was a legendary figure in Quebec Civil Law and in the study of civil law at McGill. His work in the reform of the Civil Code, in the development of new theories in the law of obligations, as well as his contributions to comparative law, and legal academia spanned approximately six decades. In this episode, we discuss with Justice Nicholas Kasirer and Professor \u00c9lise Charpentier about the continued importance of Professor Cr\u00e9peau\u2019s contributions to legal pedagogy at McGill, his publications in the McGill Law Journal, and creation of the Paul-Andr\u00e9 Cr\u00e9peau Center for Private and Comparative Law. Note on the episode: The McGill Law Journal specifies that although many of the Civil Code Revision Office\u2019s suggestions were accepted, the Quebec legislator did not accept them all in the drafting of the new Civil Code of Quebec, in force since 1994. Le regrett\u00e9 professeur Paul-Andr\u00e9 Cr\u00e9peau \u00e9tait une figure l\u00e9gendaire dans le droit civil qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois et dans l\u2019\u00e9tude du droit civil \u00e0 McGill. Son travail sur la r\u00e9forme du Code civil et sur le d\u00e9veloppement de nouvelles th\u00e9ories dans le droit des obligations, ainsi que ces contributions au droit compar\u00e9 et au monde acad\u00e9mique du droit s\u2019\u00e9tayait sur six d\u00e9cennies. Dans cet \u00e9pisode, nous discutons avec le juge Nicholas Kasirer et la professeure \u00c9lise Charpentier par rapport \u00e0 l\u2019importance continue des contributions du professeur Cr\u00e9peau \u00e0 la p\u00e9dagogie juridique \u00e0 McGill, ses publications au sein de la Revue de droit de McGill, et la cr\u00e9ation du Centre Paul-Andr\u00e9 Cr\u00e9peau de droit priv\u00e9 et compar\u00e9. Note sur l'\u00e9pisode: La Revue de droit de McGill tient \u00e0 pr\u00e9ciser que bien que plusieurs propositions du rapport de l\u2019Office de r\u00e9vision du Code civil aient \u00e9t\u00e9 accept\u00e9es, le l\u00e9gislateur qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois ne les a pas tous suivies lors de la r\u00e9daction du nouveau Code civil du Qu\u00e9bec, entr\u00e9 en vigueur en 1994. ","author_name":"The McGill Law Journal Podcast","author_url":"http:\/\/lawjournal.mcgill.ca\/en\/text\/96","html":"<iframe title=\"Libsyn Player\" style=\"border: none\" src=\"\/\/html5-player.libsyn.com\/embed\/episode\/id\/33961477\/height\/90\/theme\/custom\/thumbnail\/yes\/direction\/forward\/render-playlist\/no\/custom-color\/88AA3C\/\" height=\"90\" width=\"600\" scrolling=\"no\"  allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen><\/iframe>","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/assets.libsyn.com\/secure\/item\/33961477"}