{"version":1,"type":"rich","provider_name":"Libsyn","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.libsyn.com","height":90,"width":600,"title":"They All Did It: Unascertainable and Merged Causes","description":"In subrogation, we typically deal with torts.  Generally, these are based on negligence, which means that the central question is one of causation: we must prove that the Defendant\u2019s actions or failure to act were both the actual and proximate cause of the Plaintiff\u2019s damages.  But what if there are not one, but two negligent defendants?  That may sound like a great problem to have, but when you can\u2019t prove which defendant\u2019s breach caused the plaintiff\u2019s harm, meeting the causation requirement can get tricky. On this week\u2019s episode, join Rebecca and Steve as they sort out two very useful rules: the unascertainable cause and the merged causes tests, which you can use to get to judgment when you have too many tortfeasors acting too negligently.  If they all did it, can they get away \u2026 with negligence?  ","author_name":"On Subrogation","author_url":"https:\/\/www.rathbonegroup.com","html":"