{"version":1,"type":"rich","provider_name":"Libsyn","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.libsyn.com","height":90,"width":600,"title":"ERISA Litigation Episode 5 - Conkright v. Frommert","description":"In ERISA Litigation episode 005, Bentley Tolk (Parr Brown Gee &amp;amp; Loveless, Salt Lake City, UT) examines the U.S. Supreme Court&amp;rsquo;s April 21, 2010&amp;nbsp;Conkright v. Frommert&amp;nbsp;decision.&amp;nbsp; The&amp;nbsp;Conkright&amp;nbsp;decision is significant for its clarification of the standard of review under ERISA when a plan administrator makes an &amp;ldquo;honest&amp;rdquo; mistake in interpreting the plan.&amp;nbsp; According to the Supreme Court, one &amp;ldquo;honest&amp;rdquo; mistake in interpreting a plan is not enough to strip a plan administrator of deference for subsequent related interpretations of the plan.\r\n&amp;nbsp;","author_name":"The Erisa Litigation Podcasts","author_url":"http:\/\/www.parrbrown.com","html":"<iframe title=\"Libsyn Player\" style=\"border: none\" src=\"\/\/html5-player.libsyn.com\/embed\/episode\/id\/3181710\/height\/90\/theme\/custom\/thumbnail\/yes\/direction\/forward\/render-playlist\/no\/custom-color\/88AA3C\/\" height=\"90\" width=\"600\" scrolling=\"no\"  allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen><\/iframe>","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/assets.libsyn.com\/secure\/content\/7880851"}