{"version":1,"type":"rich","provider_name":"Libsyn","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.libsyn.com","height":90,"width":600,"title":"ERISA Preemption And Post-Glenn Precedent","description":"In the second episode, Bentley Tolk of Parr Brown Gee &amp;amp; Loveless interviews Michael J. Salmanson of Salmanson Goldshaw, PC about some recent cases involving ERISA preemption:&amp;nbsp;Golden Gate Restaurant Ass&amp;rsquo;n v. City and County of San Francisco, 546 F.3d 639 (9th Cir. 2008);&amp;nbsp;Golden Gate Restaurant Ass&amp;rsquo;n v. City and County of San Francisco, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 5191 (9th Cir. Mar. 9, 2009); and&amp;nbsp;American Council of Life Insurers v. Ross, No. 08-1406 (6th Cir. Mar. 18, 2009).&amp;nbsp; Those cases have important implications for ERISA litigation defense - both in the Ninth and Sixth Circuits, and in Utah and elsewhere.\r\nThe second portion of the episode addresses how the lower courts have responded to the Supreme Court&amp;rsquo;s decision in&amp;nbsp;Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Glenn, 128 S. Ct. 2343 (2008).&amp;nbsp; Specifically, the episode explores the following cases on this topic:&amp;nbsp;Doyle v. Liberty Life Assur. Co. of Boston, 542 F.3d 1352 (11th Cir. 2008); andMcCauley v. First Unum Life Insur. Co., 551 F.3d 126 (2d Cir. 2008).","author_name":"The Erisa Litigation Podcasts","author_url":"http:\/\/www.parrbrown.com","html":"<iframe title=\"Libsyn Player\" style=\"border: none\" src=\"\/\/html5-player.libsyn.com\/embed\/episode\/id\/3181698\/height\/90\/theme\/custom\/thumbnail\/yes\/direction\/forward\/render-playlist\/no\/custom-color\/88AA3C\/\" height=\"90\" width=\"600\" scrolling=\"no\"  allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen><\/iframe>","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/assets.libsyn.com\/secure\/content\/7880815"}