{"version":1,"type":"rich","provider_name":"Libsyn","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.libsyn.com","height":90,"width":600,"title":"Distributed Leadership, Movement Building & Mass Giving, with Asha Curran","description":"In this episode we talk to Asha Curran, CEO of Giving Tuesday - ahead of this year\u2019s event on Tuesday 2nd December -about distributed leadership, movement building and the importance of mass giving. Including: Decentralisation & Social Movements What is the key appeal of networked movements? Do people believe they are more effective (particularly when it comes to huge global challenges that might require radical solutions, like the climate crisis and racial inequality\/injustice) or is it more about their ability to democratize participation and offer more active modes of engagement? How can traditional nonprofits embrace some of the benefits of networked or decentralized approaches? Does this require a major change of structure, or just mindset? Distributed leadership, new power and leaderlessness GT is a combination of elements with formal structure and many informal elements - how do these different parts of the movement interact? How much centralised input is there in shaping\/setting parameters for the formal elements? Are there necessary limits on the freedom of informal elements? (E.g. parameters\/red lines on what can be associated with GT brand, even informally) How are these set and policed? How do you manage power dynamics within a decentralised movement to prevent the emergence of hidden cliques\/elites, and to ensure that everyone\u2019s voice can be heard equally? Mass giving Can mass giving movements like GT help to counter concerns about the potentially anti-democratic impact of big money philanthropy? As GT has developed into a global movement, how has this informed your understanding of what we should think of as \u201cgiving\u201d? Can GT help us to develop a better global perspective & understand differences and similarities between cultures of giving around the world? Do different countries around the world place more emphasis on non-financial giving in their approaches to GT? Has this had an impact on thinking in the US? What is the idea behind the Starling Collective? How does this fit with the wider work of Giving Tuesday? Platforms, philanthropy & civil society Is there an important role for movements like GT in ensuring that as more giving shifts to the online world, we have platforms and infrastructure that is driven by civil society values rather than ceding control of online giving to commercial platforms (who may wish to offer giving functionality as an add-on for users)? What responsibilities do giving platforms have towards those giving and receiving through them? Are they ever neutral intermediaries, or do they need to accept a more active role in informing donors, assessing recipients etc? Data What is the Giving Tuesday Data Collaborative? How did it come about? What have you learned about giving trends in the US (and elsewhere) so far through the GTDC? Can we use data to drive more giving\/better giving? If so, how?   Related Links: Giving Tuesday The Giving Tuesday Data Commons Giving Tuesday UK The Starling Collective Asha\u2019s interview with Stanford\u2019s Digital Impact blog and podcast Our Giving Thought podcast interview with Lucy Bernholz on digital civil society Our Giving Thought podcast interview with Regan Ralph on funding social movements Our Giving Thought podcast on philanthropy and structure Rhod\u2019s paper \u201cNetworking Opportunities: Rediscovering Decentralisation in Philanthropy & Civil Society?\u201d ","author_name":"Giving Thought","author_url":"https:\/\/www.cafonline.org\/about-us\/","html":"