<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<oembed>
  <version>1</version>
  <type>rich</type>
  <provider_name>Libsyn</provider_name>
  <provider_url>https://www.libsyn.com</provider_url>
  <height>90</height>
  <width>600</width>
  <title>What the Supreme Court’s Janus decision means for unions and workers</title>
  <description>In this episode of Intersections, Vanessa Williamson and Elizabeth Mann Levesque review the Supreme Court's ruling on Janus v. AFSCME, which bars public-sector unions from collecting &amp;quot;fair share&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;agency&amp;quot; fees from non-union members to offset collective bargaining costs.&amp;amp;nbsp;Levesque and Williamson put the Janus case in the context of &amp;quot;right-to-work&amp;quot; legislation, the decline of private-sector unions, and the recent wave of teachers' strikes to assess how the decision will affect public-sector unions in the short term and future of unions' economic and political power more broadly.&amp;amp;nbsp; Full show notes:&amp;amp;nbsp;https://brook.gs/2Jz61OQ&amp;amp;nbsp; Hosted by Adrianna Pita. With thanks to audio producer Gaston Reboredo, Chris McKenna, Brennan Hoban, and Fred Dews for additional support. Send feedback email to&amp;amp;nbsp;intersections@brookings.edu, and follow us and tweet us at&amp;amp;nbsp;@policypodcasts&amp;amp;nbsp;on Twitter. Intersections is part of the Brookings Podcast Network. </description>
  <author_name>Please Discuss ...</author_name>
  <author_url>http://www.brookings.edu/utility/podcasts</author_url>
  <html>&lt;iframe title="Libsyn Player" style="border: none" src="//html5-player.libsyn.com/embed/episode/id/6826009/height/90/theme/custom/thumbnail/yes/direction/forward/render-playlist/no/custom-color/88AA3C/" height="90" width="600" scrolling="no"  allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html>
  <thumbnail_url>https://assets.libsyn.com/secure/content/206649178</thumbnail_url>
</oembed>
