<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<oembed>
  <version>1</version>
  <type>rich</type>
  <provider_name>Libsyn</provider_name>
  <provider_url>https://www.libsyn.com</provider_url>
  <height>90</height>
  <width>600</width>
  <title>The Vendor Trap That Derails Carve-Outs</title>
  <description>Days before closing a carve-out, Danielle Fortier's team found the seller's vendor list was off by dozens of vendors. Danielle, a partner at Cooley with four corporate carve-outs closed this year, explains why: back-office vendors are shared across every business line, and deal leads rarely focus on them early. Her roadmap maps every entanglement, checks it against what the buyer already has, and sends only true gaps to the TSA. Cloud hosting, finance and IT security are the usual traps. Settle TSA length and pricing in the LOI. She has seen sellers assume three months while buyers assumed 18. Her biggest warning is over-relying on the TSA. Six months in, you still go to the seller for everything. That vendor surprise happens when entanglements, gap owners and TSA schedules live in lists nobody fully trusts. DealRoom keeps carve-out diligence, open requests and integration planning in one connected platform, so gaps found in diligence carry into the post-close plan. See how Infoblox consolidated 5+ tools from pipeline through integration:&amp;amp;nbsp;Infoblox's Case Study </description>
  <author_name>M&amp;amp;A Science</author_name>
  <author_url>http://www.mascience.com</author_url>
  <html>&lt;iframe title="Libsyn Player" style="border: none" src="//html5-player.libsyn.com/embed/episode/id/43214428/height/90/theme/custom/thumbnail/yes/direction/forward/render-playlist/no/custom-color/88AA3C/" height="90" width="600" scrolling="no"  allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html>
  <thumbnail_url>https://assets.libsyn.com/secure/item/43214428</thumbnail_url>
</oembed>
