<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<oembed>
  <version>1</version>
  <type>rich</type>
  <provider_name>Libsyn</provider_name>
  <provider_url>https://www.libsyn.com</provider_url>
  <height>90</height>
  <width>600</width>
  <title>The Valley Current®: Are Patent Cases Still Major Sources of Potential Liability for Big Tech?</title>
  <description>A tiny vibration inside an iPhone has triggered one of the biggest patent fights in U.S. history. A federal jury ordered Apple to pay $5.72 billion after finding that its haptic technology infringed patents held by Taction Technology, producing what the briefing describes as the largest reported patent jury verdict ever. But in high-stakes patent litigation, a massive verdict may be only the beginning. Host Jack Russo examines why billion-dollar awards can shrink or disappear on appeal, how seemingly small issues involving damages, apportionment, and verdict forms can reshape a case, and why litigation finance has made it possible for smaller patent holders to wage years-long battles against Big Tech. With Apple’s $5.72 billion verdict now headed into the far less forgiving world of post-trial motions and appeals, the case offers a reminder that patent liability can still reach extraordinary levels, even when the final number remains unsettled. Jack Russo  MBA/JD/LLM NITA Master Trial Advocate Certified Appellate Specialist&amp;amp;nbsp;  </description>
  <author_name>THE VALLEY CURRENT®️ COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLP</author_name>
  <author_url>http://computerlaw.libsyn.com/website</author_url>
  <html>&lt;iframe title="Libsyn Player" style="border: none" src="//html5-player.libsyn.com/embed/episode/id/43061368/height/90/theme/custom/thumbnail/yes/direction/forward/render-playlist/no/custom-color/88AA3C/" height="90" width="600" scrolling="no"  allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html>
  <thumbnail_url>https://assets.libsyn.com/secure/content/206784753</thumbnail_url>
</oembed>
