<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<oembed>
  <version>1</version>
  <type>rich</type>
  <provider_name>Libsyn</provider_name>
  <provider_url>https://www.libsyn.com</provider_url>
  <height>90</height>
  <width>600</width>
  <title>Ep 33: Philosophy and Mental Health; Foucault's Nightmare?</title>
  <description>Welcome one and all to Professor Metal's Irate Debate and Calamitous Commentary with The Philosophical Chain Gang&#13;
Today's episode is Madness and Philosophy: Foucault's Nightmare?&#13;
Warning: We are discussing the concept of Mental Health in this episode, which we understand is a topic about which many people hold strong opinions. These are our own opinions and experiences, and should not be perceived as professional opinions or advice&#13;
The Philosophers discuss what we mean when we talk about madness&#13;
Sean explains Pathologies and what that term means&#13;
The Philosophers talk about mental illness as something that negatively impacts your life&#13;
Sean explains how this could be viewed through Value Theory&#13;
Ryver and Sean clarify this point by discussing some of the push-back against these ideas of mental health&#13;
Bruce talks about the ability the internet grants to form communities and allow people to come together over things that differ from the perceived societal norm&#13;
Ryver and Sean explain the benefits of this in terms of things people cannot or do not feel comfortable talking about in their local community&#13;
Sean discusses the evolution of the idea of community as a result of the expansion of the internet&#13;
Bruce proposes that perhaps the medical model of mental health will need to change with the evolution of expanding cultures&#13;
Sean counters that this may not be a problem with the medical model of mental illness as much as the public health model, that perhaps there needs to be an individual idea&#13;
The Philosophers talk about the dangers of self-selected communities creating a form of intellectual homogeneity that reinforces behaviours that do not integrate with the society as a whole&#13;
Sean clarifies that these same groups can provide the support people with a particular world-view need to better integrate into said society&#13;
Ryver discusses some of the benefits of these groups from his own experiences&#13;
Sean and Bruce go over the benefits of introspection and the tools Philosophy can give us to analyse our own world&#13;
Ryver discusses the evolution of societal ideas of normalcy, including changes to the tool many use to diagnose mental illness: The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)&#13;
Sean and Ryver talk about the history of treating mental illness&#13;
Sean discusses the history of how people with what we now refer to as mental illness were treated, as well as what Foucault had to say about this history&#13;
Ryver briefly talks about the history of asylums&#13;
Bruce compares and contrasts the historical and modern problems with how mental illness is considered as a whole&#13;
Sean discusses Foucault and the transitions of epochs of knowledge and how this impacts our ideas of illness in general and mental illness specifically&#13;
Bruce proposes Aristotelian virtue ethics as a precursor to modern psychology&#13;
Ryver posits that some of the behaviours we consider to be pathologies are actually useful character traits in certain professions and fields&#13;
Sean expands on this point by discussing the importance of efficiency in our society&#13;
The Philosophers discuss different ways this can apply to people with mental illness&#13;
Sean and Ryver talk about how perception of these traits are tied quite closely to socio-economic status&#13;
Ryver explains how this view seems to have evolved in the modern Zeitgeist&#13;
Sean and Bruce raise questions about this view&#13;
Ryver responds by clarifying the points he has raised&#13;
The Philosophers discuss how the views on and the stigma towards mental illness disproportionately impact the poor&#13;
Sean and Bruce flesh out this idea as it pertains to modern American culture&#13;
The Philosophers talk about discussions on mental health and mental illness, and encourage you to have these discussions&#13;
&amp;amp;nbsp;&#13;
And as always please give us your honest review on iTunes and Stitcher. It helps us make the show better with every one we get to read.&#13;
Help keep the show going and the moon safe by supporting us on Patreon&#13;
https://patreon.com/Philosophy&#13;
Help keep us from disappearing by engaging us on the social media platform of your choice:&#13;
http://www.philosophicalchaingang.com&#13;
http://www.reddit.com/r/professormetal&#13;
http://www.twitter.com/PChainGang&#13;
https://www.facebook.com/PChainGang&#13;
https://www.pinterest.com/PChainGang/&#13;
http://pchaingang.tumblr.com/</description>
  <author_name>Professor Metal's Irate Debate and Calamitous Commentary</author_name>
  <author_url>http://www.PhilosophicalChainGang.com</author_url>
  <html>&lt;iframe title="Libsyn Player" style="border: none" src="//html5-player.libsyn.com/embed/episode/id/4296597/height/90/theme/custom/thumbnail/yes/direction/forward/render-playlist/no/custom-color/88AA3C/" height="90" width="600" scrolling="no"  allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html>
  <thumbnail_url>https://assets.libsyn.com/secure/content/11478233</thumbnail_url>
</oembed>
