<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<oembed>
  <version>1</version>
  <type>rich</type>
  <provider_name>Libsyn</provider_name>
  <provider_url>https://www.libsyn.com</provider_url>
  <height>90</height>
  <width>600</width>
  <title>Samuel Browd | Venture Studios, BCI, and Digital Neurosurgery</title>
  <description>Dr. Samuel Browd is a pediatric neurosurgeon, professor at the University of Washington, and Co-CEO/Chief Medical Officer of NeuFluent, a venture studio focused on neurological technologies. In this episode, we discuss his path from early neuroscience research and pediatric neurosurgery into device development, brain-computer interfaces, and the challenge of moving promising neurotechnology from universities into real clinical use. We also explore the idea of “digital neurosurgery”: how neurosurgery still captures enormous amounts of valuable data in analog or siloed ways, why AI and computer vision may reshape surgical workflows, and how brain-computer interfaces could become a major part of neurosurgery over the next decade. Along the way, Dr. Browd reflects on startup formation, the role of venture studios, ethics around neural data, and why students entering the field today may be arriving at a uniquely important moment.  Top 5 takeaways 1. Neurotechnology translation is still too slow. Dr. Browd argues that the traditional path from academic discovery to clinical technology is expensive, time-consuming, and often inefficient. Through NeuFluent, he is trying to rethink how universities, clinicians, engineers, strategics, and investors can work together to move neurological technologies toward patients faster. 2. Venture studios may offer a different model for neurotech commercialization. Rather than acting only like an accelerator, NeuFluent brings together engineering, regulatory, legal, marketing, and commercialization expertise around neurological technologies. The goal is to evaluate market need, development path, and exit strategy earlier, before spending years and large amounts of capital building something without a clear home. 3. Neurosurgery still wastes or underuses valuable data. Dr. Browd describes neurosurgery as still largely analog, even though procedures generate rich digital data from imaging, electrophysiology, navigation, microscopes, and intraoperative tools. He argues that much of this information is siloed, uncaptured, or used only for immediate clinical purposes rather than organized for computational analysis and future innovation. 4. AI and BCI could transform neurosurgery, but workflow matters. Sam emphasizes that new tools will only be adopted if they fit naturally into clinical workflows. If a technology adds extra steps for busy surgeons, adoption will be limited; the opportunity is to use existing data streams and workflows to build better systems around the surgeon rather than burdening them. 5. Students are entering neurotechnology at a uniquely exciting moment. For students interested in BCI, neurosurgery, AI, or medical devices, Dr. Browd sees this as a rare moment where powerful computational tools and clinical need are converging. His advice is to “lean in” because the field now has the potential to move faster and directly help patients in ways that were not possible before.  Timestamps 0:00 Introduction to Dr. Samuel Browd, pediatric neurosurgery, NeuFluent, and neurotechnology 0:50 Sam’s path from Gainesville to neurosurgery, neuroscience, and device development 2:10 Early interest in Alzheimer’s disease, epilepsy, MRI, and brain science 3:35 Pediatric neurosurgery and the long-term impact of treating children 4:20 Seeing early Utah arrays and becoming interested in BCI 6:10 What NeuFluent is and why neurotech may need a venture studio model 8:50 How NeuFluent differs from a traditional incubator or accelerator 10:40 Academic commercialization, the valley of death, and changing university incentives 12:10 NeuFluent’s current status, patents, stealth work, and approach to building from within 15:50 What “digital neurosurgery” means 17:25 Creating the Foundation for Digital Neurosurgery and organizing neurosurgery around AI 20:30 Neurosurgical data that is currently uncaptured, siloed, or underused 23:20 Why workflow integration determines whether new technologies are adopted 25:30 The next 10–20 years of BCI, implantable devices, AI, and neurosurgery 27:40 What needs to change to bring neurotechnology to patients faster 30:50 Advice for students entering BCI, neurosurgery, and neurotechnology 33:00 Why Sam is optimistic about AI and neurotechnology </description>
  <author_name>Neural Implant podcast - the people behind Brain-Machine Interface revolutions</author_name>
  <author_url>http://neuralimplantpodcast.com</author_url>
  <html>&lt;iframe title="Libsyn Player" style="border: none" src="//html5-player.libsyn.com/embed/episode/id/42321420/height/90/theme/custom/thumbnail/yes/direction/forward/render-playlist/no/custom-color/87A93A/" height="90" width="600" scrolling="no"  allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html>
  <thumbnail_url>https://assets.libsyn.com/secure/content/204787855</thumbnail_url>
</oembed>
