<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<oembed>
  <version>1</version>
  <type>rich</type>
  <provider_name>Libsyn</provider_name>
  <provider_url>https://www.libsyn.com</provider_url>
  <height>90</height>
  <width>600</width>
  <title>Perspectives: Episode 125 – Oil, power, and portfolio discipline</title>
  <description>In this episode of Perspectives, Escala Chief Investment Officer, Tracey McNaughton, talks about today’s tensions in the Middle East, why geopolitical volatility is often shorter than feared and what it means for US-China relations. Plus, why credit investing demands ruthless diversification. (0:53) Let’s start with the geopolitical shock. The United States and Israel have launched coordinated strikes on Iran, escalating tensions in a way we haven’t seen for years. (1:42) We saw something similar in February 2022 when Russia invaded Ukraine. Oil spiked to over $120 a barrel. But within six months it was back under $80. Markets adjusted. (3:26) And it did create inflation back then – in the order of 9-10% in Australia. Markets don’t like supply-side shocks because they tend to be inflationary. (4:46) How does this align with Trump’s negotiating style. Historically, Trump’s approach has often been to escalate early and aggressively — create leverage, create uncertainty, reset the negotiating dynamic — and then reposition any de-escalation as a deal. (5:28) Trump is due to visit China soon. And China is the world’s largest oil importer. How does this conflict interact with US–China relations? (6:30) Are we entering a fundamentally more dangerous geopolitical era? Or does it just feel that way? (9:16) So, when investors assume every geopolitical event is the start of a structural bear market, history suggests caution? (9:46) What about defence spending? Are we entering a structural rearmament cycle? (11:16) And then there’s globalisation. For years we were told economic interdependence reduces the probability of war. (12:48) So where does that leave investors? (14:17) Let’s pivot to private credit. It’s been back in the headlines recently. Some managers have tightened withdrawal terms, and it’s prompted questions about risk. Is there something investors should be worried about? (18:17) When people see headlines about stress in a particular credit vehicle, what should they focus on? </description>
  <author_name>'Perspectives' by Escala</author_name>
  <author_url>https://escalapartners.com.au/</author_url>
  <html>&lt;iframe title="Libsyn Player" style="border: none" src="//html5-player.libsyn.com/embed/episode/id/40306825/height/90/theme/custom/thumbnail/yes/direction/forward/render-playlist/no/custom-color/88AA3C/" height="90" width="600" scrolling="no"  allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html>
  <thumbnail_url>https://assets.libsyn.com/secure/content/199197295</thumbnail_url>
</oembed>
