<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<oembed>
  <version>1</version>
  <type>rich</type>
  <provider_name>Libsyn</provider_name>
  <provider_url>https://www.libsyn.com</provider_url>
  <height>90</height>
  <width>600</width>
  <title>AI Research Update: 8 papers you need to know for 2026</title>
  <description>Research Update: 8 papers on AI in Education you need to know for 2026 &amp;amp;nbsp; In this episode, Ray and Dan provide a rapid-fire rundown of the most significant research papers hitting the AI in Education space so far in 2026. After a series of news-heavy episodes, the hosts catch up on the data behind synthetic avatars, grading accuracy, and the psychological biases we hold against AI. &amp;amp;nbsp; Key highlights include: &amp;amp;nbsp; Synthetic Lecturers: Exploring stakeholder perspectives on digital twins and the emotional reaction to the term Deepfake in academia. &amp;amp;nbsp; The Grading Gap: Why ChatGPT tends to be more sycophantic and generous with weak work compared to human instructors. &amp;amp;nbsp; The Disclosure Penalty: New findings from 16 experiments showing why humans devalue creative writing the moment they know AI is involved. &amp;amp;nbsp; Prompting Hacks: The &amp;quot;Groundhog Day&amp;quot; method 😂 Why simply repeating your prompt twice can boost accuracy across 70 different AI systems. &amp;amp;nbsp; Tools for Researchers: Insights into Jasper Roe’s research checklist and the &amp;quot;Paper Banana&amp;quot; tool for automating scientific diagrams. &amp;amp;nbsp; Links to all the research papers discussed&amp;amp;nbsp;  Can synthetic avatars replace lecturers? An exploratory international study of higher education stakeholder perceptions| https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41239-025-00568-4&amp;amp;nbsp;   Who grades best? Comparing ChatGPT, peer, and instructor evaluations across varying levels of student project quality  https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02602938.2025.2588682?src=&amp;amp;nbsp;   The Artificial Intelligence Disclosure Penalty: Humans Persistently Devalue AI-Generated Creative Writing https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001889&amp;amp;nbsp; The older &amp;quot;Transparency Dilemma&amp;quot; paper referenced too:  https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597825000172&amp;amp;nbsp;   Asking generative artificial intelligence the right questions improves writing performance  https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X25000141?via%3Dihub&amp;amp;nbsp;   When AI only asks: how question-driven dialogue shapes prewriting in the classroom  https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1740044/full&amp;amp;nbsp;   Prompt Repetition Improves Non-Reasoning LLMs https://arxiv.org/html/2512.14982v1&amp;amp;nbsp;   How to Use Generative AI in Educational Research  https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/how-to-use-generative-ai-in-educational-research/916142E735B678F86A59240BFE651F5C &amp;amp;nbsp;  PaperBanana: Automating Academic Illustration for AI Scientists https://dwzhu-pku.github.io/PaperBanana/  https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.23265&amp;amp;nbsp;  </description>
  <author_name>AI in Education Podcast</author_name>
  <author_url>http://aipodcast.education</author_url>
  <html>&lt;iframe title="Libsyn Player" style="border: none" src="//html5-player.libsyn.com/embed/episode/id/40156205/height/90/theme/custom/thumbnail/yes/direction/forward/render-playlist/no/custom-color/88AA3C/" height="90" width="600" scrolling="no"  allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html>
  <thumbnail_url>https://assets.libsyn.com/secure/item/40156205</thumbnail_url>
</oembed>
