<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<oembed>
  <version>1</version>
  <type>rich</type>
  <provider_name>Libsyn</provider_name>
  <provider_url>https://www.libsyn.com</provider_url>
  <height>90</height>
  <width>600</width>
  <title>Employment Relations Podcast – Safety in the workplace: drug and alcohol testing and policies</title>
  <description>January is a time where organisations often review their policies and procedures for best practice compliance.&amp;amp;nbsp; One policy that might need a review, following recent case law developments, is your organisation’s drug and alcohol policy.&amp;amp;nbsp; In this episode of Employment Law for the Time Poor, Emily Haar, Partner, and Maida Mujkic, Associate, consider the implications for organisations arising from a string of 2024 and 2025 decisions in the Fair Work Commission.&amp;amp;nbsp; In these cases, the issue of whether a dismissal following a positive substance test was “unfair” turned on how testing policies were worded, whether the organisation tested for “impairment” or a mere positive result, and how the relevant policy was communicated to staff.&amp;amp;nbsp; Having a very clear policy that sets out the rules is important, but if no one in the organisation understands what is expected of them, or how the employer will deal with a positive result, the organisation is placed at significant risk.&amp;amp;nbsp; The situation becomes even more complicated because prescription medications, including medicinal cannabis, can also create potential safety risks in the workplace.&amp;amp;nbsp; Taking the time to get your safety framework right, including regular reviews to address changes, will be time well spent. The following cases are discussed in this episode:   Gauci v DP World Brisbane Pty Limited  [2024] FWC 2351  Woodgate v Queensland Rail  [2024] FWC 3165  Sydney Trains v Goodsell  [2024] FWCFB 401  Mills v Glamorgan Spring Bay Council  [2025] FWC 116  Sydney International Container Terminals Pty Ltd v Hancock  [2025] FWCFB 106  DP World Sydney Limited v Witherden  [2025] FWCFB 133  For more on these issues, including relating to consultation, see our earlier Insight here:  https://piperalderman.com.au/insight/lessons-for-employers-how-failure-to-consult-on-workplace-policy-led-to-reinstatement-of-intoxicated-worker/ </description>
  <author_name>Employment Law for the Time Poor</author_name>
  <author_url>https://www.piperalderman.com.au</author_url>
  <html>&lt;iframe title="Libsyn Player" style="border: none" src="//html5-player.libsyn.com/embed/episode/id/39725345/height/90/theme/custom/thumbnail/yes/direction/forward/render-playlist/no/custom-color/a9263d/" height="90" width="600" scrolling="no"  allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html>
  <thumbnail_url>https://assets.libsyn.com/secure/content/197480450</thumbnail_url>
</oembed>
