<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<oembed>
  <version>1</version>
  <type>rich</type>
  <provider_name>Libsyn</provider_name>
  <provider_url>https://www.libsyn.com</provider_url>
  <height>90</height>
  <width>600</width>
  <title>Open and Obvious</title>
  <description>Not every hazard leads to liability – especially when the danger is right in front of you. The Open and Obvious doctrine is a defense that can be raised to protect a landowner from liability for a hazardous condition that was “open and obvious” to a reasonable person.&amp;amp;nbsp; While almost all jurisdictions recognize some version of the open and obvious defense, there are nuances from state to state.&amp;amp;nbsp; Listen in to this week’s episode as Rebecca and Steve discuss this defense, and the counterarguments to it, to make sure that you can successfully recover from a tortfeasor trying to avoid liability for your subrogation claim.&amp;amp;nbsp; Join us in understanding how some hazards are just too obvious to ignore. </description>
  <author_name>On Subrogation</author_name>
  <author_url>https://www.rathbonegroup.com</author_url>
  <html>&lt;iframe title="Libsyn Player" style="border: none" src="//html5-player.libsyn.com/embed/episode/id/39510850/height/90/theme/custom/thumbnail/yes/direction/forward/render-playlist/no/custom-color/88AA3C/" height="90" width="600" scrolling="no"  allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html>
  <thumbnail_url>https://assets.libsyn.com/secure/item/39510850</thumbnail_url>
</oembed>
