<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<oembed>
  <version>1</version>
  <type>rich</type>
  <provider_name>Libsyn</provider_name>
  <provider_url>https://www.libsyn.com</provider_url>
  <height>90</height>
  <width>600</width>
  <title>#31 - Challenging the 4-Function Worldview w/ Dr. Adithyan &amp;quot;Dithu&amp;quot; Rajaraman</title>
  <description>In this episode Zach and Caleb are joined by Dr. Adithyan &amp;quot;Dithu&amp;quot; Rajaraman where the discussion focuses on challenging the 4-function worldview in the context of assessing and treating problem behavior.&amp;amp;nbsp; 2 CEs (BACB, IBAO, and/or QABA) are available for this episode. You can purchase them at https://www.functionalrelationspodcast.com If you feel that our podcast is a valuable contribution to the field of ABA, please consider supporting us on Patreon at https://www.patreon.com/functionalrelationspodcast  To connect with Dithu and the FTF team for a number of different types of support in serving individuals with severe problem behavior (among other behavioral challenges), click here:&amp;amp;nbsp;https://ftfbc.com/contact-us/ &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; References:  Pertaining to Mand compliance:1. Seminal Paper: Bowman, L. G., Fisher, W. W., Thompson, R. H., &amp;amp;amp; Piazza, C. C. (1997). On the relation of mands and the function of destructive behavior.&amp;amp;nbsp;Journal of applied behavior analysis,&amp;amp;nbsp;30(2), 251-265.  2. Literature&amp;amp;nbsp;review:&amp;amp;nbsp;Rajaraman, A., &amp;amp;amp; Hanley, G. P. (2021). Mand compliance as a contingency controlling problem behavior: A systematic review.&amp;amp;nbsp;Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,&amp;amp;nbsp;54(1), 103-121.  Pertaining to the evolution of functional analysis: 1.&amp;amp;nbsp;Carr, E. G. (1977). The motivation of self-injurious behavior: a review of some hypotheses.&amp;amp;nbsp;Psychological bulletin,&amp;amp;nbsp;84(4), 800.  2.&amp;amp;nbsp;Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., &amp;amp;amp; Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self‐injury.&amp;amp;nbsp;Journal of applied behavior analysis,&amp;amp;nbsp;27(2), 197-209.  3.&amp;amp;nbsp;Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., &amp;amp;amp; McCord, B. E. (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A review.&amp;amp;nbsp;Journal of applied behavior analysis,&amp;amp;nbsp;36(2), 147-185.  On Literature reviews:Narrative review examples:  1.&amp;amp;nbsp;Thompson, R. H., &amp;amp;amp; Iwata, B. A. (2005). A review of reinforcement control procedures.&amp;amp;nbsp;Journal of applied behavior analysis,&amp;amp;nbsp;38(2), 257-278.  2.&amp;amp;nbsp;Friman, P. C., Hayes, S. C., &amp;amp;amp; Wilson, K. G. (1998). Why behavior analysts should study emotion: The example of anxiety.&amp;amp;nbsp;Journal of applied Behavior analysis,&amp;amp;nbsp;31(1), 137-156.  3.&amp;amp;nbsp;Rajaraman, A., Austin, J. L., Gover, H. C., Cammilleri, A. P., Donnelly, D. R., &amp;amp;amp; Hanley, G. P. (2022). Toward trauma‐informed applications of behavior analysis.&amp;amp;nbsp;Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,&amp;amp;nbsp;55(1), 40-61.  Systematic or Scoping review (not meta-analyses) examples relevant to the discussion:  1.&amp;amp;nbsp;Jessel, J., Hanley, G. P., &amp;amp;amp; Ghaemmaghami, M. (2020). On the standardization of the functional analysis.&amp;amp;nbsp;Behavior analysis in practice,&amp;amp;nbsp;13, 205-216.  2.&amp;amp;nbsp;Ghaemmaghami, M., Hanley, G. P., &amp;amp;amp; Jessel, J. (2021). Functional communication training: From efficacy to effectiveness.&amp;amp;nbsp;Journal of applied behavior analysis,&amp;amp;nbsp;54(1), 122-143.  3.&amp;amp;nbsp;Howell, M., Dounavi, K., &amp;amp;amp; Storey, C. (2019). To choose or not to choose?: A systematic literature review considering the effects of antecedent and consequence choice upon on-task and problem behaviour.&amp;amp;nbsp;Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,&amp;amp;nbsp;6, 63-84.  4.&amp;amp;nbsp;Hustyi, K. M., Logue, J. J., &amp;amp;amp; Hall, S. S. (2025). Skill-based treatment for challenging behavior in autism spectrum disorder: A scoping review of treatment characteristics and outcomes.&amp;amp;nbsp;Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders,&amp;amp;nbsp;119, 102523.  5.&amp;amp;nbsp;Cengher, M., Bowman, M. D., Shawler, L. A., &amp;amp;amp; Ceribo‐Singh, M. S. M. (2022). A systematic review of mands for information.&amp;amp;nbsp;Behavioral Interventions,&amp;amp;nbsp;37(3), 864-886.  Meta-analyses examples relevant to the discussion:  1.&amp;amp;nbsp;Gover, H. C., Hanley, G. P., &amp;amp;amp; Ruppel, K. W. (2022). On the generality of preference for contingent reinforcement.&amp;amp;nbsp;Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,&amp;amp;nbsp;55(2), 318-336.  2.&amp;amp;nbsp;Slaton, J. D., &amp;amp;amp; Hanley, G. P. (2018). Nature and scope of synthesis in functional analysis and treatment of problem behavior.&amp;amp;nbsp;Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,&amp;amp;nbsp;51(4), 943-973.  3. Layman, L. N., Dufrene, B. A., Ackley, M. M., Weaver, C. M., Schneider, D. E., LaBrot, Z. C., ... &amp;amp;amp; Olmi, D. J. (2024). Interview-informed synthesized contingency analyses on challenging problem behavior: A single-case meta-analysis. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 11(3), 640-658.  </description>
  <author_name>Functional Relations</author_name>
  <author_url>https://www.functionalrelationspodcast.com</author_url>
  <html>&lt;iframe title="Libsyn Player" style="border: none" src="//html5-player.libsyn.com/embed/episode/id/36801700/height/90/theme/custom/thumbnail/yes/direction/forward/render-playlist/no/custom-color/88AA3C/" height="90" width="600" scrolling="no"  allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html>
  <thumbnail_url>https://assets.libsyn.com/secure/content/189046620</thumbnail_url>
</oembed>
