1 rich Libsyn https://www.libsyn.com 90 600 In this episode, I break down three key reasons why Judge Wilkens declined to confirm the House v NCAA settlement during the April 7 hearing: 1) Future Athlete Impact- Judge Wilkens expressed concern that the settlement could unfairly affect future student-athletes who weren't part of the case and had no opportunity to object, potentially settling a troubling legal precedent. She asked the attorney to provide legal precedent to justify the 10 year Injunction which will impact future student athletes.&amp;nbsp; 2) Roster Limits - She challenged the immediate implementation of roster size limits, suggesting that current student-athletes should be &quot;grandfathered in&quot; to protect their roster spots or that limits should be phased in over time.&amp;nbsp; 3) $600 Dollar Review on Third party NIL Deals - Judge Wilkens questioned the logic behind questioning deals over $600. She pressed the attorneys to explain how the $600 limit would benefit student-athletes.&amp;nbsp; Go to my home page to jillmcbridebaxter.com to set up a meeting.&amp;nbsp; https://linktr.ee/jillmcbridebaxter&amp;nbsp; Get on my email list or sign up for one of my free classes. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Born to Be A Sports Agent https://www.jillmcbridebaxter.com <iframe title="Libsyn Player" style="border: none" src="//html5-player.libsyn.com/embed/episode/id/36246565/height/90/theme/custom/thumbnail/yes/direction/forward/render-playlist/no/custom-color/88AA3C/" height="90" width="600" scrolling="no" allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen></iframe> https://assets.libsyn.com/secure/content/187374205