<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<oembed>
  <version>1</version>
  <type>rich</type>
  <provider_name>Libsyn</provider_name>
  <provider_url>https://www.libsyn.com</provider_url>
  <height>90</height>
  <width>600</width>
  <title>NT Wright and Herschel Hobbs</title>
  <description>Many ask what notable scholars generally support my interpretation of the text. I have a list on my Statement of Faith page of non-Calvinistic scholars, but they vary in how they approach certain aspects of the text (as do all the soteriological camps). Today we take a look at the work of NT Wright and Herschel Hobbs, two well respected theologians. Let's dive in!&#13;
To join our discussion go to www.soteriology101.com&#13;
For more on Dr. Hobbs, see:&amp;amp;nbsp;http://www.sbts.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2010/07/sbjt_071_spr03_dockery.pdf&#13;
&amp;amp;nbsp;&#13;
NT Wright's work has been praised by many scholars of varying views, including&amp;amp;nbsp;James D.G. Dunn,&amp;amp;nbsp;Gordon Fee,&amp;amp;nbsp;Richard B. Hays&amp;amp;nbsp;and&amp;amp;nbsp;Rowan Williams, former&amp;amp;nbsp;Archbishop of Canterbury. Critics of his work are also found across the broad range of theological camps. Some Reformed theologians such as&amp;amp;nbsp;John Piper&amp;amp;nbsp;have sought to question Wright's theology, particularly over whether or not he denies the&amp;amp;nbsp;Protestant&amp;amp;nbsp;doctrine&amp;amp;nbsp;of&amp;amp;nbsp;justification by faith alone. Although Piper considers Wright's presentation confusing, he does not dismiss Wright's view as false. In response, Wright has stated he wishes Piper would &amp;quot;exegete Paul differently&amp;quot; and that his book &amp;quot;isn't always a critique of what I'm actually saying.&amp;quot; Wright also expressed how he has warmed to Piper and considers him a &amp;quot;good, beloved brother in Christ, doing a good job, building people up in the faith, teaching them how to live.&amp;quot;[15]&amp;amp;nbsp;In 2009, Wright has since addressed the issue in his book&amp;amp;nbsp;Justification: God's Plan and Paul's Vision&amp;amp;nbsp;(Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, 2009). He has sought to clarify his position further in an interview with&amp;amp;nbsp;InterVarsity Press.[15]&amp;amp;nbsp;Many conservative evangelicals have also questioned whether Wright denies&amp;amp;nbsp;penal substitution, but Wright has stated that he denies only its caricature but affirms this doctrine, especially within the overall framework of the&amp;amp;nbsp;Christus Victor&amp;amp;nbsp;model of atonement.[16]&amp;amp;nbsp;Despite criticism of some of his work by Reformed theologians, other Reformed leaders have embraced his contribution in other areas, such as&amp;amp;nbsp;Tim Keller&amp;amp;nbsp;who praised Wright's work on the resurrection.[17]&amp;amp;nbsp;(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N._T._Wright)&#13;
&amp;amp;nbsp;&#13;
&amp;amp;nbsp;</description>
  <author_name>Soteriology 101 w/ Dr. Leighton Flowers</author_name>
  <author_url>http://soteriology101.com</author_url>
  <html>&lt;iframe title="Libsyn Player" style="border: none" src="//html5-player.libsyn.com/embed/episode/id/3589067/height/90/theme/custom/thumbnail/yes/direction/forward/render-playlist/no/custom-color/8c040b/" height="90" width="600" scrolling="no"  allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html>
  <thumbnail_url>https://assets.libsyn.com/secure/item/3589067</thumbnail_url>
</oembed>
