1 rich Libsyn https://www.libsyn.com 90 600 &amp;nbsp; The research has been done, and the law review articles have been written. @Honeypacpod, along with LSAC and anyone else who reads these scholar's research, have evidence that the LSAT is a psychometrically unsound examination, and it’s time that we abandon it from a practical, ethical and logical perspective. It has no place in a world that looks for equity in justice. Thinking the LSAT is racist isn’t a fringe or unpopular musing – it’s a fact. Look at the data, and look at the research of these professors. It’s time for the LSAT to be abolished. &amp;nbsp; Sources: Professor Vernellia R. Randall - The Misuse of the LSAT: Discrimination Against Blacks and Other Minorities in Law School Admissions https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1178&amp;amp;context=lawreview &amp;nbsp; LaTasha Hill - Less Talk, More Action: How Law Schools Can Counteract Racial Bias of LSAT Scores in the Admissions Process https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1336&amp;amp;context=rrgc &amp;nbsp; Professor Delgado - Official Elitism or Institutional Self Interest - 10 Reasons Why UC Davis Should Abandon the LSAT (and Why Other Good Law Schools Should F Schools Should Follow Suit) Edward L. Barrett, Jr. Lecture on Constitutional Law https://scholarship.law.ua.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1420&amp;amp;context=fac_articles &amp;nbsp; honeyPAC https://sites.libsyn.com/honeypac <iframe title="Libsyn Player" style="border: none" src="//html5-player.libsyn.com/embed/episode/id/33606432/height/90/theme/custom/thumbnail/yes/direction/forward/render-playlist/no/custom-color/88AA3C/" height="90" width="600" scrolling="no" allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen></iframe> https://assets.libsyn.com/secure/content/180219072