<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<oembed>
  <version>1</version>
  <type>rich</type>
  <provider_name>Libsyn</provider_name>
  <provider_url>https://www.libsyn.com</provider_url>
  <height>90</height>
  <width>600</width>
  <title>ERISA Litigation Episode 5 - Conkright v. Frommert</title>
  <description>In ERISA Litigation episode 005, Bentley Tolk (Parr Brown Gee &amp;amp;amp; Loveless, Salt Lake City, UT) examines the U.S. Supreme Court&amp;amp;rsquo;s April 21, 2010&amp;amp;nbsp;Conkright v. Frommert&amp;amp;nbsp;decision.&amp;amp;nbsp; The&amp;amp;nbsp;Conkright&amp;amp;nbsp;decision is significant for its clarification of the standard of review under ERISA when a plan administrator makes an &amp;amp;ldquo;honest&amp;amp;rdquo; mistake in interpreting the plan.&amp;amp;nbsp; According to the Supreme Court, one &amp;amp;ldquo;honest&amp;amp;rdquo; mistake in interpreting a plan is not enough to strip a plan administrator of deference for subsequent related interpretations of the plan.&#13;
&amp;amp;nbsp;</description>
  <author_name>The Erisa Litigation Podcasts</author_name>
  <author_url>http://www.parrbrown.com</author_url>
  <html>&lt;iframe title="Libsyn Player" style="border: none" src="//html5-player.libsyn.com/embed/episode/id/3181710/height/90/theme/custom/thumbnail/yes/direction/forward/render-playlist/no/custom-color/88AA3C/" height="90" width="600" scrolling="no"  allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen oallowfullscreen msallowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html>
  <thumbnail_url>https://assets.libsyn.com/secure/content/7880851</thumbnail_url>
</oembed>
